Current time: 03-16-2010, 06:09 PM Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)


[-]
UserID: -
(This will display a message for the specified user, telling him you want to talk to him)
Shout: -
User Panel
Loading...
Smilies
PopupSB
MyCode
Colors

Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
O.S. Hierarchy
12-26-2009, 04:40 PM
Post: #1
O.S. Hierarchy
The early days of Windows were an analog to the formative years of a human infant. Windows 3.1 had a new fresh face that always kept us entertained (“A file manager! Amazing!”) and was even good for a few useful tasks. But 3.1 also needed constant maintenance to keep working—in much the same way a baby can’t care for himself.

The consumer PC reached early childhood with Windows 95. Like a rambunctious 4-year-old, Win95 could get around and communicate, but you had to keep it away from things that could badly hurt it (to Win95, the Internet is the equivalent of a fork dangling from an electrical socket). Like a 4-year-old, Windows 95 could almost take care of basic maintenance by itself but still needed supervision to avoid “accidents.” And like a child just learning the nuances of the language, you could hold a real conversation with Win95—just as long as you kept things simple.

Windows 98 represented late childhood. With support for modern hardware, it was vastly more capable than Win95, but it still required hand-holding to cross the street safely. And, like a rowdy 8-year-old, everything in Win98 was better after a midafternoon nap.

And then came Windows XP, the respectful 12-year-old who works at his dad’s office. Unlike the hormonal know-it-all teenager that would be Windows Vista, you could treat WinXP like a full-blown adult. Hell, WinXP did everything we needed—quickly and effectively without any lip. Unfortunately, however, its status as a quasi-adult eventually caused WinXP problems. It was smart, but not wise and experienced. Like a 12-year-old, the OS will hop in damn near anyone’s proverbial van, despite constant warnings to be wary.

And now we come to Vista, the gawky 14-year-old. It knows what it wants to be and what it wants to do, but somehow it just can’t get everything working well enough to make it happen.

What will Windows 7 be? Will it be a meth’d-out, convenience-store-robbing 18-year-old? Or will it be a cool 22-year-old go-getter, just starting his first real job and looking to take on the world? Only time will tell...
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Add Thank You Quote this message in a reply
12-26-2009, 07:58 PM
Post: #2
RE: O.S. Hierarchy
Ive been useing Win 7 since beta... FAITHFULLY... IT IS THE BEST THING SINCE WEED!

[Image: rep.png]
Like My Posts Give me Rep Cool

[Image: signature.php?uid=1]
[Image: 926795.png]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
12-27-2009, 01:42 AM
Post: #3
RE: O.S. Hierarchy
The demand for new content is too high these days. I'm slowly migrating to linux at the moment and will only use windows for gaming.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
12-27-2009, 12:47 PM
Post: #4
RE: O.S. Hierarchy
If linux had more game support I would use it on a normal basis. Windows 7 has proven to be far superior to vista though and I can say that I am pleased so far. Nice post shockcell.

[Image: 27424.gif] [Image: 913447.png] [Image: folding.jpg] [Image: xcmercy.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-04-2010, 07:38 PM
Post: #5
RE: O.S. Hierarchy
Iono if anyone else here plays with servers like i do BUt what are yall favorite Distro Like openBSD freebsd centos.... so on so forth

[Image: rep.png]
Like My Posts Give me Rep Cool

[Image: signature.php?uid=1]
[Image: 926795.png]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-05-2010, 06:29 AM
Post: #6
RE: O.S. Hierarchy
microsoft server 2010, Oracle...blah blah blah
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-05-2010, 10:44 AM
Post: #7
RE: O.S. Hierarchy
Hate on it all you like, but I still prefer CentOS with Apache...

[Image: 27424.gif] [Image: 913447.png] [Image: folding.jpg] [Image: xcmercy.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-05-2010, 12:34 PM
Post: #8
RE: O.S. Hierarchy
meeeh DJDOG will swear by centos but i prefer freebsd just for the firewall lol ... it tis a pain in ass though....

[Image: rep.png]
Like My Posts Give me Rep Cool

[Image: signature.php?uid=1]
[Image: 926795.png]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-05-2010, 12:38 PM
Post: #9
RE: O.S. Hierarchy
I hate software firewalls
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
01-05-2010, 12:56 PM
Post: #10
RE: O.S. Hierarchy
lol yea but lol im poor i cant afford cisco Sad lol

[Image: rep.png]
Like My Posts Give me Rep Cool

[Image: signature.php?uid=1]
[Image: 926795.png]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump: